The Johnson & Johnson's Tylenol Controversies

            




<<Previous Page

THE FALL AND RISE OF TYLENOL

Tylenol received a major setback in late 1982 when it was found that many bottles of Tylenol extra strength capsules were laced with cyanide. The publicity about the poisoned capsules caused a nationwide panic. A hospital in Chicago received 700 telephone calls about Tylenol in just one day. People in cities across the US were admitted to hospitals on suspicion of cyanide poisoning. Within the first 10 days of the crisis, J&J received 1,411 telephone calls.

Business Ethics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Ethics, Case Studies

or
Business Ethics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Ethics, Case Studies

or
PayPal (7 USD)

J&J acted immediately after the first reports of deaths came in. The company immediately alerted consumers across the US, via the media, not to consume any type of Tylenol product. The police drove through Chicago where the incidents were first reported, announcing the warning over loudspeakers, while all the three national television networks reported the deaths on their evening news broadcasts. The company told consumers not to use the product until the extent of the tampering could be determined. It recalled all Tylenol bottles and publicized the recall with full-page newspaper ads. Consumers were asked to return the bottles to the stores and exchange them for Tylenol capsules that were not subjected to cyanide tampering. The company shut down the production, distribution and advertising of the medicine temporarily. A day later, the Food and Drug Administration advised consumers to avoid taking Tylenol capsules.

From the beginning, J&J worked with federal investigators. After eight million recalled capsules were tested, it was determined that the bottles had been tampered with on store shelves. The poisoned capsules were placed on the shelves of six different stores in Chicago, IL, US. Only 75 capsules from different eight bottles had actually been laced with cyanide. Analysts opined that recalling all Tylenol products was not an easy decision for J&J. There was a great deal of discussion on recalling Tylenol at the national level. Some executives were worried about the panic that could result in the industry over such a wide scale recall.

A month after the crisis, J&J launched an aggressive campaign to re-build (See Exhibit IV) Tylenol’s image. The then Chairman and CEO of J&J, James E. Burke said, "It will take time, it will take money, and it will be very difficult; but we consider it a moral imperative, as well as good business, to restore Tylenol to its preeminent position." The company decided to re-launch the product in a new triple-tamper-resistant package by the end of 1982. It’s efforts paid off and the company was able to recapture 32 of its original 37 percent market share just six months after the cyanide poisoning.

According to analysts, the way J&J handled the crisis became the model for crisis management. They said that the company’s response to the crisis demonstrated its commitment to customer safety and the quality of its product. Also, J&J’s openness and communication with the public helped the company maintain a high level of credibility and customer trust. Burke repeatedly assured the public of J&J’s commitment to customer safety. Rather than thinking about the financial implications, Burke followed the company’s Credo (See Exhibit V). He immediately sent a team of scientists to find the source of tampering. R. David Pittle, former commissioner for the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, commented, "They did the right thing and they did it promptly. Putting consumer safety above all else can help develop a loyalty from the consumer." Though J&J’s stock declined in the initial weeks of the crisis, it soon rebounded because of the company’s positive communications.

Next Page>>

Advertisement...

top